In the corporate sphere , there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that shake the foundations of integrity . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , falls squarely in the latter category —a saga of alleged misconduct that deeply harms the reputation of a solitary executive but brings scrutiny over the company’s principles .

Even in light of the disturbing claims , Collins has kept his position , appearing untouched by the controversies engulfing him. How has this been permitted to continue ? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of unprofessional conduct started with violations of the company’s code of conduct , but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it transformed into a series of ethical breaches that has left team members disenchanted and stakeholders confused .

While attending a professional growth course — intended to foster better management—David Collins allegedly transformed what should have been a growth-oriented experience into a series of reckless events . It’s reported he spent company-sponsored junkets attempting to seduce female colleagues , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s business principles , all while his home life was kept in the dark.

But the misconduct didn’t end with romantic pursuits . One of the more shocking revelations involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to share suggestive pictures to women—a gross misappropriation of professional tools and a destruction of integrity. His bold misuse of Microsoft Teams to distribute risqué communications—including icons to boast about infidelities —paints a picture of a man indifferent to the outcomes . Following these digital advances , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on several instances during work time , despite his being married and her having a spouse . This flagrant misuse of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but destroyed families — producing a wake of personal ruin that extended well beyond the office .

Why can this behavior be allowed to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly shattered all norms is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, originates in a concerning absence of supervision within the company . Issues have been another article raised , yet Collins persists unabated.

This absence of retribution broadcasts an ominous signal : that authority and prestige within the enterprise can guard against punishment . It creates a toxic work environment , demoralizes employees , and ultimately compromises the organization’s integrity .